Alec Kriebel

Quadratic convergence of SOS-density bounds on convex bodies

Read the paper (PDF, 5 pages) · Complete source and verification materials (ZIP) · Zenodo record · CC BY 4.0

Plain-English explanation · Read on this page · Collaboration


Original abstract

For every fixed compact convex body K⊂ℝⁿ with nonempty interior and every real polynomial f, the normalized Lebesgue sum-of-squares density bound of degree at most 2r has error O_{K,f}(r⁻²) for every integer r≥1. We give a self-contained proof and an explicit constant, using one global square. A quadratic Taylor upper estimator reduces the objective to a scalar endpoint problem. Homothetic contraction compares every sublevel shell with the same core mass that normalizes a fixed power of a Dirichlet polynomial; that mass cancels before summation. This proves the quadratic upper rate in the convex-body/Lebesgue regime of the 2018 Oberwolfach question. A classical interval example shows that the exponent is sharp in the worst case. The proxy and the broad localization and relative-mass mechanisms have established precedents; no firstness or new-method claim is made.

The idea in plain English

A polynomial can be minimized by concentrating a sum-of-squares probability density near one of its minimizers. This note proves a quadratic error rate on every fixed full-dimensional compact convex body with Lebesgue measure, using a single global square.

The precise result

Let K⊂ℝⁿ be compact and convex with nonempty interior, with n≥1, and let f be a real polynomial. The bound Hᵣ(f,K) minimizes ∫_K f q dx over global sums of squares q of degree at most 2r subject to ∫_K q dx=1. For every integer r≥1, the error satisfies 0≤Hᵣ(f,K)−f*≤CₙG/r², where f*=min_K f.

For any minimizer a, set H=max_K ‖∇²f‖_op, γ=1+H/2, g(x)=∇f(a)·(x−a)+γ‖x−a‖², and G=max_K g. The theorem gives 0<G<∞ and the explicit constant Cₙ=4(n+2)²(π/2)^(2n+4)(1+2^(n+2)). A single square of a real polynomial, normalized over the whole body, witnesses this upper bound.

The objective need not be convex, and the boundary of K need not be smooth or semialgebraic. The same proof applies to objectives of class C² on an open neighborhood of K. The constants belong to the fixed body and objective; no useful bound uniform over all dimensions or degenerating bodies is asserted.

Why the result holds

At a constrained minimizer, the gradient points nonnegatively along every segment into the convex body. Taylor's formula therefore supplies the nonnegative quadratic upper proxy g. After scaling it to u=g/G, contraction toward the minimizer compares every sublevel volume with a smaller one: F(t)≤(t/s)ⁿF(s) for 0<s≤t, where F(t)=volₙ{x∈K:u(x)≤t}.

An explicit Dirichlet polynomial has a positive core of width proportional to the inverse square of its degree and a controlled tail. A fixed even power makes it a global square. Every dyadic tail shell is bounded relative to the same core mass that lower-bounds the normalizing integral. That mass cancels before summation, leaving the quadratic rate. The degree calculation and a constant-density fallback cover every positive integer order.

For K=[0,1] and f(t)=t, the note also proves the classical lower estimate Hᵣ(f,K)≥1/[4(r+1)²]. The same estimate holds for f(t,y)=t on [0,1]×[−1,1]^(n−1). Together with the upper theorem, this gives a fixed worst-case instance of order r⁻² in each dimension. It does not give a positive matching lower rate for every objective; constant objectives have zero error.

Scope and limitations

The note addresses the convex-body/Lebesgue regime in Laurent's contribution, joint work with de Klerk, to the 2018 Oberwolfach report. It explicitly uses probability densities of unit mass. Slot and Laurent's Theorem 11 gives the earlier O((log r)²/r²) bound for this hierarchy and asks whether the logarithm can be removed.

The constrained-gradient and quadratic-upper-estimator reductions already appear in de Klerk–Laurent and Slot–Laurent. Endpoint polynomial localization and comparison of shell mass with local core mass have classical precedents, including Totik–Varga. Their older endpoint-polynomial theorem, combined with Markov's inequality and the relative-mass argument, also yields the scoped quadratic upper rate. The interval/product worst-case exponent is likewise prior work of de Klerk–Laurent. No firstness or new-method claim is made, and present worldwide open status is not certified.

The theorem uses Lebesgue measure and a quadratic proxy. It does not assert the same rate for arbitrary reference measures or for the restricted hierarchy whose densities must be polynomials of the original objective for general nonconvex f. The construction assumes a global minimizer is available; it does not supply an efficient way to locate one or compute all required integrals. The explicit constant is coarse, rather than an optimal asymptotic coefficient.

The complete source and verification archive accompanies the paper. Finite exact checks and numerical examples supplement the written universal proof; they are not certificates of its infinite quantifiers.

Status and AI use

Unrefereed preprint; extensive AI assistance; no external human peer review or formal proof-assistant certification.

AI tools were used extensively in the solution, derivations, source checks, verification, drafting, and adversarial review. This preprint is unrefereed and has not received external human peer review. It is not a formal proof-assistant certificate.

Manuscript and declared publication date: 17 October 2026, version 1.0.

Read the paper

The complete 5-page deposited paper is available below.

Open PDF in a full window · Download PDF · Download the original from Zenodo

Supporting materials

Collaborate on this result

Substantive proof checks, counterexamples, and precise comparisons with prior work are welcome. Authorship and acknowledgments depend on actual research contributions and mutual agreement.

Authorship and responsibilities would be discussed in relation to the substantive contributions made.

Contact Alec

Cite this paper

Alec Kriebel. (2026). Quadratic convergence of SOS-density bounds on convex bodies (Version 1.0, 17 October 2026) [Preprint]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23442760

Download BibTeX

Background and prior work